Chapters:
0:00 - Intro with Joanna Junak 0:18 - Colin Mendelsohn brings us the latest Australian THR updates 0:52 - Nicotine restrictions in Australia 1:57 - What is Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council? 2:27 - NHMRC accused of promoting misleading vaping information 2:52 - NHMRC statement claims that vaping is not an effective aid to quitting smoking 4:50 - Vaping ≠ gateway to smoking 5:31 - NHMRC rejects evidence of vaping benefits 6:38 - Restricting access to safer nicotine products puts smokers' health at risk 7:32 - Antivaping bias from the NHMRC? 8:13 - Impartial review of vaping evidence in Australia needed 8:41 - Closing remarksTranscription:
1
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:18,300
Hello and welcome. I'm Joanna Junak and this is GFN News on GFN.TV.
2
00:00:18,300 --> 00:00:22,380
Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council is the country's top health and
3
00:00:22,380 --> 00:00:29,160
medical research organization. Its advice guides national health policy on various issues.
4
00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:35,880
In 2022, the NHMRC published a position statement on electronic cigarettes.
5
00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:41,440
Last week, a review of this document by leading scientists was published in the journal Addiction
6
00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:48,480
and was highly critical of the NHMRC document. Dr Colin Mendelsohn was the lead author of
7
00:00:48,480 --> 00:00:52,680
the review and will tell us more about their assessment.
8
00:00:52,680 --> 00:00:59,000
Hello Colin. Firstly, can you tell us about the state of vaping in Australia?
9
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:05,880
Hi Joanna. Australia has taken a precautionary approach to vaping. So vaping is opposed by
10
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:12,640
all levels of government and almost all health and medical organizations. And the media is
11
00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:18,400
also hostile to vaping. Australia's got the most restrictive regulations in the Western
12
00:01:18,400 --> 00:01:25,320
world. Nicotine liquid is only available legally with a prescription from a doctor and can
13
00:01:25,320 --> 00:01:31,640
be legally purchased only from a pharmacy or by importation from overseas.
14
00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:38,600
However, even the government has acknowledged that this approach has failed miserably. 90%
15
00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:44,720
of vapers do not have a prescription and there's a thriving black market which freely sells
16
00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:51,960
unregulated products to adults and children. In response to this, the government appears
17
00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:57,720
to be planning to ban all imports and restrict vaping even further.
18
00:01:57,720 --> 00:02:02,240
What is the role of the National Health and Medical Research Council?
19
00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:09,080
The NHMRC is Australia's leading government health and medical research body and is highly
20
00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:14,640
respected. It provides grants for medical research and develops position statements
21
00:02:14,640 --> 00:02:21,080
to guide national health policy. Well, last year it released a statement on vaping which
22
00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:27,400
is widely used to justify the anti-vaping narrative in Australia.
23
00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:34,120
You recently led a review of the NHMRC statement. What was your assessment of it?
24
00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:40,740
Our review found that the NHMRC document was seriously flawed. It contained misinformation
25
00:02:40,740 --> 00:02:48,400
and was biased against vaping. We concluded that it fails to meet the high standard expected
26
00:02:48,400 --> 00:02:54,360
of a leading international scientific body. What were some of your concerns about the
27
00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:58,400
document? Well, firstly, it exaggerated the risks of
28
00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:04,920
vaping and failed to compare them to the alternative, tobacco smoking. For example, it emphasised
29
00:03:04,920 --> 00:03:09,880
the presence of chemicals in vapour without making it clear that most of these chemicals
30
00:03:09,880 --> 00:03:18,280
are at low or trace levels and that most are far lower than in tobacco smoke. It also exaggerated
31
00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:24,880
the long-term risks of vaping. However, we are confident that long-term vaping is highly
32
00:03:24,880 --> 00:03:30,560
likely to be far less harmful than smoking, based on the substantial reduction in toxic
33
00:03:30,560 --> 00:03:36,920
chemicals and biomarkers, and because of the improvements in the health of many smokers
34
00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:45,520
and in health conditions when smokers switch. It also incorrectly claims that vaping nicotine
35
00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:52,640
causes seizures, the serious lung conditions, EVALI and so-called popcorn lung, when there
36
00:03:52,640 --> 00:04:00,600
is no evidence for any of these conditions. Secondly, the NHMRC incorrectly claimed that
37
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:06,800
there is weak evidence that vaping is an effective quitting aid. Well, this is in contrast to
38
00:04:06,800 --> 00:04:13,080
the 2022 Cochrane review of randomised controlled trials, which concluded that there is high
39
00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:21,360
certainty evidence that electronic cigarettes are more effective than NRT. It also dismissed
40
00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:26,360
the findings from other studies that support the randomised controlled trial results, such
41
00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:33,600
as evidence from the UK Stop Smoking Services, observational studies, population studies,
42
00:04:33,600 --> 00:04:39,040
and a decline in national smoking rates where vaping is freely available. And when you take
43
00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:45,680
all this evidence together, the argument is compelling that vaping is an effective quitting
44
00:04:45,680 --> 00:04:50,320
aid for both individuals and at the population level.
45
00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:56,680
What did the NHMRC say about youth vaping? Well, the statement gave strong support to
46
00:04:56,680 --> 00:05:03,440
the gateway theory that vaping causes young people to go on to smoke. However, we now
47
00:05:03,440 --> 00:05:09,200
know that the opposite is more likely to be true. As youth vaping has increased, we've
48
00:05:09,200 --> 00:05:15,200
seen an accelerated decline in youth smoking in many countries. There's growing evidence
49
00:05:15,200 --> 00:05:22,960
that vaping is diverting more people away from smoking than encouraging them to smoke.
50
00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:27,520
Most importantly, it doesn't appear that youth vaping leads to sustained cigarette
51
00:05:27,520 --> 00:05:34,800
use, which is the main public health concern. Did the NHMRC acknowledge the effect of vaping
52
00:05:34,800 --> 00:05:40,800
on smoking rates? The NHMRC dismissed the clear evidence that
53
00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:47,280
vaping is already having a positive net public health effect. Numerous studies have found
54
00:05:47,280 --> 00:05:52,560
that vaping is associated with more frequent quit attempts and greater quit success than
55
00:05:52,560 --> 00:06:00,320
other methods, and that the decline in smoking has accelerated since vaping became available.
56
00:06:00,320 --> 00:06:06,080
For example, in New Zealand, in the two years after vaping was legalised in 2020, the adult
57
00:06:06,080 --> 00:06:14,640
daily smoking rate fell by an unprecedented 33% in two years. In comparison, in Australia,
58
00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:20,800
the smoking rate declines by about 2% per year.
59
00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:26,400
But most importantly, vaping is the most popular aid for quitting or reducing smoking in Western
60
00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:33,280
countries. And because of its proven effectiveness and wide reach, it's likely to have a far
61
00:06:33,280 --> 00:06:39,040
greater population effect than any other cessation therapy.
62
00:06:39,040 --> 00:06:43,200
What was their view about the precautionary principle?
63
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:48,560
The NHMRC statement argues that we should follow the precautionary principle and not
64
00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:55,280
allow vaping because of uncertainty about long-term risks. However, the precautionary
65
00:06:55,280 --> 00:07:02,160
principle requires a comparison of the risks of introducing a new product with the risks
66
00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:08,880
of delaying its introduction. Now, in the case of vaping, the relatively small risks
67
00:07:08,880 --> 00:07:16,000
of harm will be far outweighed by the substantial known harms from delaying access to current
68
00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:21,600
smokers. And while there's some uncertainty about vaping, it's well established that
69
00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:29,120
up to two in three smokers who smoke long-term will die prematurely from smoking. And many
70
00:07:29,120 --> 00:07:32,880
of these could be prevented by vaping.
71
00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:36,560
Was there any evidence of bias in the NHMRC report?
72
00:07:36,560 --> 00:07:42,720
Yes, look, we were very concerned about the make-up of the Working Committee. Three members
73
00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:49,920
of the Committee have published papers opposing vaping. Other members represent organisations
74
00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:57,520
which have made strong public anti-vaping statements. No experts who take a positive
75
00:07:57,520 --> 00:08:04,400
view on the potential of vaping or even smoker or vapour representatives were included.
76
00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:09,920
Having a strong position on vaping can influence how people interpret the evidence to support
77
00:08:09,920 --> 00:08:13,600
a predetermined policy position.
78
00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:17,360
And what were your conclusions from this review?
79
00:08:17,360 --> 00:08:22,640
We concluded that the report should be withdrawn and that an impartial review of the evidence
80
00:08:22,640 --> 00:08:29,760
was needed by a balanced committee with an independent chairperson with no predetermined
81
00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:37,600
views. Also, we think there should be a review on how such a flawed report was issued by
82
00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:41,760
a leading government health organisation.
83
00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:46,560
Thank you, Colin. That's all for today. Tune in next time here on GFN TV or on our
84
00:08:46,560 --> 00:08:52,960
GFN TV podcast. You can also find transcriptions of each episode on the GFN TV website.
85
00:08:52,960 --> 00:09:07,840
Thanks for watching or listening. See you next time.